[Apple senior vice president of operations, Jeff Williams]
Working conditions at the [Apple senior vice president of operations, Jeff Williams] operated by Foxconn, where giant amounts of the devices used around the world are made, including Apple’s iPhone and iPad, are improving. Granted, that’s going from genuinely horrible to slightly less bad, yet it’s movement and momentum in a direction decidedly larger for the people who make the stuff that we use. That according to Keith Bradsher and Charles Duhigg, writing as component of the [Apple senior vice president of operations, Jeff Williams] ‘ iEconomy series. when [Apple senior vice president of operations, Jeff Williams], returned from that March meeting to California, variations began. amongst them, say those with firsthand knowledge, was the hiring of approximately 30 professionals into Apple’s social responsibility unit in the last year, which tripled the size of that division and brought high-profile corporate activists into the company. Two widely respected former Apple executives — Jacky Haynes and Bob Bainbridge — were recruited to come back to help lead the unit, reporting sooner or later to Mr. Williams and the chief executive, Timothy D. Cook. The iEconomy series itself seems to have changed as well.
Apple isn’t in the identify of this article.
Cynically, it’s probable that an article about improvements doesn’t benefit as much from the added sensationalism. Optimistically, it’s doable that the NYT realized their specialize in Apple was undermining the seriousness of the very real difficulties they’re covering. (Though Apple enjoys the positive consequences of the massive amount of attention they’re given, and being singled out for criticism is the equal and contrary edge of that sword. )
Yet working conditions stay arduous, and issues multifaceted. But last summer, fed up with the 25-hour train outing to see his family, Mr. Zhang moved to Chongqing and joined Quanta. He enjoys the better facilities and dorms. He almost always visits his parents’ home. But his take-home pay has fallen by practically a 3rd and the thought that his brother could must drop out of school so he can help the family gnaws at Mr.
Sunday, December 1st is [#protected_0#], an annual recognition of the fight against HIV and AIDS. Apple’s commemorating the occasion by temporarily rebranding its retail stores with red Apple logos, according to 9to5Mac.
Apple is a frequent collaborator with RED, the charity that raises money for AIDS education, research and treatment. Earlier this year Bono, lead singer of the rock band U2 and a major figure behind RED, said that Apple has raised million in total. Apple does so by donating a portion of the sales of specially branded Apple products to the charity. The money donated goes to the Global Fund, which supports AIDS programs in Africa.
Just last month, Apple senior vice president of Design Jony Ive and industrial designer Marc Newson partnered for a celebrity auction by creating a number of one-off designs like a red Mac Pro, special desk and Leica digital viewfinder camera, and by getting products from other prominent designers. The total raised in the auction, held by prestigious auction house Sotheby’s, was more than million once Bono pitched in; that number was doubled by a matching gift from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the philanthropic charity created by Microsoft founder Bill Gates and his wife Melinda.
You can buy (PRODUCT)RED branded merchandise directly from Apple if you’d like to support their efforts.
Tweet Word surfaced back in April that Apple distancing itself from fierce competitor Samsung, forming a partnership with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Those plans didn’t pan out immediately, however, because the Taiwanese company – called TSMC – failed to make chips that were up to Apple’s diverse standards. in the present day TSMC announced that it has ironed out the issues and officially entered into a care for Apple, but by way of the subsequent year Samsung will continue to be the company’s main supplier.
As Samsung grew to become a larger competitor against Apple – at last shipping out more smartphones globally than iPhones – Apple began taking steps to distance itself from the company, calling such moves “risk diversification” and other terms. The reality is that Apple still very heavily depends on Samsung for some of its hardware, and that distancing itself from the Korean supplier has proved slow. both the businesses have engaged in fierce back-and-forth legal battles over patents, adding additional tension to the symbiotic relationship they share. Sources told The Wall Street Journal that executives at Apple sense that by depending on Samsung, the corporate is inherently limited in its “ability to controls its destiny”, due in part to limited negotiation capability and branching out into other technologies. One former Apple executive in specific reportedly stated that the notion of taking all of the work and time that Apple has spent with Samsung and opening with a new supplier from scratch is “daunting. ” As well, Samsung is definitely one of the best suppliers for high-end components, and finding an alternative which could meet its needs is proving difficult, as the delays with TSMC have shown. despite the fact that Apple relies on Samsung for microprocessors for its slates and iPhones, it has moved away from using the manufacturer’s displays on nearly all of its devices, with only some of the newer iPads’ screens coming from the Korean company.
I’m going to zag rather than zig right here and do something various for this week’s editor’s desk column. as opposed to several issues I’m going to focus on one. I’m going to put phrases to one thing that’s that’s been nagging at me for weeks, months, and years .
And I’m all out of mincing and sugar coating…
I genuinely believe that no person can genuinely examine Samsung’s mobile products during the last decade and not contemplate them anything apart from a ruthless, relentless replica of everything popular that’s came before. I’m not saying Samsung doesn’t continuously push the limits of hardware specifications and skills as a lot if not extra than anyone else. They do. But they’ve done it by systematically, institutionally copying what other vendors have already done. Samsung gas done it to such a degree, and with such a consistency, that I’m flabbergasted they can show up in court, swear an oath, and claim anything otherwise. Claiming it doesn’t matter, that all phones and pills and icons should appear alike, I may perhaps understand. But claiming they don’t copy? As a legal strategy it sounds absurd. Before the iPhone, Samsung copied the BlackBerry with… Wait for it… The BlackJack. RIM sued, and Samsung changed the call to Jack, but kept the same design. Then, as now, they looked at the market leader and as opposed to asking how they can make “what’s next”, they asked how they could make what would be as close as attainable “next to” it on a shelf. Rather than setting a path for the future, they got down to subsume the present. Following the iPhone, when Apple showed the industry what “was next”, rather than attempting to do to the iPhone and later the iPad what Apple did to Palm and BlackBerry, Table PC and netbooks, Samsung conscientiously, deliberately, made their personal smartphones and tablets look and work as close to indistinguishably from Apple products as possible.
I’m going to zag rather than zig here and do something various for this week’s editor’s desk column. instead of several themes I’m going to center of attention on one. I’m going to put words to something that’s that’s been nagging at me for weeks, months, and years .
And I’m all out of mincing and sugar coating…
I truly trust that no one can honestly observe Samsung’s mobile products over the ultimate decade and not take into account them something other than a ruthless, relentless replica of every part popular that’s came before.
I’m not saying Samsung doesn’t continuously push the limits of hardware specifications and functions as a lot if not more than someone else. They do. But they’ve done it by systematically, institutionally copying what other vendors have already done. Samsung gas done it to such a degree, and with such a consistency, that I’m flabbergasted they are able to teach up in court, swear an oath, and claim anything else otherwise. Claiming it doesn’t matter, that all phones and tablets and icons ought to look alike, I could understand. But claiming they don’t copy? As a legal strategy it sounds absurd. before the iPhone, Samsung copied the BlackBerry with… Wait for it… The BlackJack. RIM sued, and Samsung modified the name to Jack, but kept an identical design. Then, as now, they looked at the market leader and instead of asking how they may make “what’s next”, they asked how they are able to make what would be as close as possible “next to” it on a shelf. Rather than setting a course for the future, they set out to subsume the present. Following the iPhone, while Apple showed the industry what “was next”, rather than trying to do to the iPhone and later the iPad what Apple did to Palm and BlackBerry, Table PC and netbooks, Samsung conscientiously, deliberately, made their own smartphones and tablets look and work as just about indistinguishably from Apple products as possible.
iBeacons – a Bluetooth 4.0 Low Energy powered technology that could enhance or enable everything from indoor mapping to location-based knowledge stores to massive leaps forward in accessibility – will reportedly start rolling out to Apple Retail Stores in the U.S. soon. Mark Gurman, [#protected_0#]:
These transmitters will be placed on the tables that house Apple products in addition to store shelves holding accessories. The technology will serve as a way to both improve the Apple shopping experience, and in-turn, boost product sales.
iBeacon support launched as part of iOS 7. When paired with an updated Apple Store app for iOS, this new system sounds like it would basically help customers to appointments, informs them about workshops relevant to their interests, and provides information about the products they’re perusing. While Smart Signs can provide some, static information when prompted, this new service sounds much smarter, verging on a virtual, networked, concierge.
Check out Gurman’s piece via the link below then let me know what you think – looking forward to your computerized shopping future?
foreign trade Commission has now issued a ban on several AT&T versions of older Apple iDevices including the iPhone 3, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 3, iPad 3G and iPad 2 3G. As you may already know, the ITC is in charge for handling trade into and out of the United States. Since Apple’s devices are made overseas, the ban would prevent these older devices from entering the country. So what led to the ban of all these Apple products? It all comes down to the violation of just a single patent, No 7,706,384, entitled “appartus and method for encoding/decoding transport format combination indicator in CDMA cellular communication system. ” according to Sammy, Apple had used technology on its older devices that violated the patent, though apparently this doesn’t follow to newer Apple devices. Apple had previously hoped to get the patent classified as a “standards essential”. This would have meant that the technology would be open for use by Apple on a ‘fair use’ licensing basis. sadly for Apple, this didn’t happen. So what’s next? This is a last ruling and needs to be overridden by either the White residence or the federal circuit courts, it also won’t go into impact immediately. Additionally, Apple has already declared plans to charm the decision. Basically, the battle isn’t precisely over just yet. If these are old products that aren’t even on store shelves anymore (with the exception of the iPhone 4) why does this ‘win’ even matter? For a couple reasons. First, it’s a symbolic victory. Sure, we aren’t speaking about the iPhone 5 or the most recent iPad, but the aspect is that Apple doesn’t win them all, residence flooring or not. it is also wonderful to see Apple get a flavor of its very own medicine. Second, this might hopefully set a precedent. Globally we are seeing Sammy win more victories than losses as of late. We are also seeing several cases thrown out, and patents invalidated . The tide may be lastly be delivering Samsung’s favor. Personally, I’m sick and tired of the patent wars. I want businesses to cease bickering over these little claims out and in of the courtroom, and instead prove themselves where it matters the most: via their products. What do you bring to mind this newest victory for Samsung?
This state of affairs is currently developing. If we hear more, we’ll be sure to keep you updated.
Every time we turn around, Apple and Samsung seem locked into yet yet another patent dispute. Internationally, lots of these battles end in favor of Samsung. Stateside? Well – we all remember Apple’s huge win against Samsung in California just last year.
This time around, Samsung has turned the tables on Apple, as the U. S. foreign trade Commission has now issued a ban on several AT&T types of older Apple iDevices including the iPhone 3, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 3, iPad 3G and iPad 2 3G. As you would already know, the ITC is answerable for handling trade into and out of the United States.
Since Apple’s devices are made overseas, the ban would prevent these older devices from entering the country. So what led to the ban of all these Apple products? It all comes down to the violation of only a single patent, No 7,706,384, entitled “appartus and manner for encoding/decoding transport structure combination indicator in CDMA cellular communication system. ” according to Sammy, Apple had used technology on its older devices that violated the patent, though interestingly this doesn’t apply to newer Apple devices. Apple had beforehand hoped to get the patent classified as a “standards essential”. This would have meant that the technology would be open for use by Apple on a ‘fair use’ licensing basis. unfortunately for Apple, this didn’t happen. So what’s next? This is a last ruling and needs to be overridden by either the White House or the federal circuit courts, it also won’t go into effect immediately. Additionally, Apple has already declared plans to charm the decision. Basically, the fight isn’t exactly over just yet. If these are old merchandise that aren’t even on shop shelves anymore (with the exception of the iPhone 4) why does this ‘win’ even matter? For a couple reasons. First, it’s a symbolic victory. Sure, we aren’t talking about the iPhone 5 or the most recent iPad, but the point is that Apple doesn’t win them all, home floor or not. it is also nice to see Apple get a flavor of its own medicine.
What’s the best way to take a weapon away from a Grammaton Cleric? The answer to that is the solution to plenty of seemingly difficult problems, including, sadly, how to get passwords away from unsuspecting users. Unfortunately, it’s not in any respect a way to get anything away from Apple.
Not ever. So we’re left with a mix of leaks, speculation, and analysis. We’ve been trying to keep away from the rumor regurgitation lately to focus on some of that analysis. More on that below. The next sizable (small) thing
A whilst ago, after Apple announced the iPad had performed in 2 years what took the iPhone 3, the iPod 5, and the Mac 20, I asked out loud what Apple could maybe do to once again equal or surpass that success? What can be Apple’s next big thing ?
It’s watching increasingly likely that next big thing also can come this fall, and can be something distinctly small . WWDC 2012
We’re only a couple of weeks away from Apple’s 2012 World Wide Developer Conference. While there might be some new Macs announced sometime around the show, we’re still hearing there won’t be any new iOS devices this summer (see above). However, we’re assuming we’ll see the first indicators of iOS 6 . I’ll be there, along with our app editor, Leanna Lofte, and our podcast co-host, Seth Clifford. If you’re a developer and you have something impressive to exhibit off, email firstname.lastname@example.org and allow us to know. We’d love to meet up. Video velocity
I don’t think it’s any secret that iMore’s easily taken things to another level whilst it comes to photography on a device blog. distinctly with Leanna’s work, it’s not impossible to imagine us being a photography blog that just happens to have iOS devices, apps, and accessories as our subject matter. Well, like I promised when we transformed the site name, we’re not going to be slowing down any time soon. So now we’re trying to bring the related artwork direction and ambition to our videos as well. We like to make them enjoyable and dynamic, engaging and informative, authoritative and definitive but always, necessarily available and approachable. We want to prevent them part of our discussion and our community, but we want to do it with way more style. It’s an effort to bring the various iMore TV aptitude to all of our efforts. To make it the rule of thumb in preference to the exception. So we’ve drafted Georgia’s husband to help us out and he’s been doing a gaggle of different experiments with the last few accessory review videos we’ve done. We’re still getting all our equipment in order, and we’re still working difficult to solidify the concept, but I’m really excited and I can’t wait to reveal you where we’re going with them. If there’s anything you ought to see us attempt — or not try! — permit me know. Podcast perfectionism
Speaking of experiments, we’re still working on the structure of our iPhone & iPad reside podcast. We’re concentrated on retaining the 60 minute difficult stop, but how we fill those 60 minutes is still up for grabs. For some weeks we tried to split things up, concentrate on a headline story, then divide the rest up between news, apps, and accessories. final week we went more with a round-table concept, invited on a guest, and actually did a deep dive on a few, appropriate stories. Specifically, we got Marc Edwards of Bjango to fill in for Seth, and Mark Gurman from 9to5Mac to fill out the panel, and we mentioned the ever loving stuffing out of what we may see from Apple when it comes to next generation and new devices. Which format do you like best so far? Do you want smaller shows or more guests? Fewer topics or more variety? What’s your best balance?
Check out closing week’s prove and tell me what you think.
Longtime frenemies [#protected_0#] and Apple are back in court after a hiatus of several months. The new trial does not question Samsung’s culpability in infringing on Apple’s patents but instead revolves on how much Samsung really has to pay in damages.
According to Apple legal counsel Harold McElhinny, that amount is a staggering 9.8 million. This is to cover all five patents that Samsung has been found to infringe on, including the now iconic pinch to zoom gesture. Samsung was originally ordered to cough up billion last year, but in March this year, US District Judge Lucy Koh said that the jury erred on calculating part of the damages, ordering the two companies to go back to trial in order to argue on the actual amount. The disputed portion that Koh struck off was 0 million, quite close to the amount that Apple is now demanding.
For its part, Samsung’s lawyer William Price is saying that this is quite a hefty price to pay. Instead, according to him, the Korean company only owes Apple .7 million. Price argues that the gigantic amount Apple is asking for covers all 13 of the Samsung products found to have violated Apple’s patents. Furthermore, even million is already a heavy amount even for Samsung, says Price. That argument might be a hard sell if one considers Apple’s testimony that Samsung made off with .5 billion in revenue for selling 10.7 million units of those infringing smartphones.
This is just the opening salvo of the trial that is taking place at the San Jose, California US District Court. The back and forth bickering is expected to continue for a week, to be followed by some rather serious jury deliberation.