One of the questions that seemingly always comes up when folks are contemplating picking up a BlackBerry 10 device is whether or not Google services are supported. Gmail is a given but folks want Google Maps, Google Now, Google+, Google Music and the various other Google offerings that are available.
As of now, Google only really builds apps for Android and iOS but that’s not to say they won’t build for other platforms such as BlackBerry 10 and Windows Phone at some point in the future. Speaking at D11, Sundar Pichai, Google’s SVP of Android, Chrome, and Apps, spoke briefly to Walt Mossberg about what it would take to get Google onboard:
We want to reach as many people as possible. For platforms that don’t have that many users at scale, we have great HTML5 apps. If they get more users, we will make apps.
It’s certainly not the answer most BlackBerry consumers want to hear but no doubt about it; it’s a safe answer for Google. If people go out and buy BlackBerry 10 devices, then the increased demand for the apps will be there. The real question I suppose, is how many BlackBerry 10 or even Windows Phone users for that matter, will it take? What’s the magical number for Google to stop and say OK, it’s time.
- The App Store Playbook Reveals The Secrets Of 10 iPhone Game Developers
- Toshiba Thrive Android 4.0 ICS update gets delayed – coming this fall
- Create beautiful, unique photo collages with Fuzel for iPhone
- Announcing the winner of a free BlackBerry 10 phone from our CrackBerry Santa Contest!
- BlackBerry App World updated to version 22.214.171.124
RSS Copyright © Hottest Mobile Phone News & Reviews | PhoneInferno [Google open to the idea of building BlackBerry 10 apps, if the user base grows], All Right Reserved. 2013.
Powered by Readers From RSS 2 Blog
Rumors have been flying around lately that Google may open retail stores here in the United States. For some, this seems like tech mecca, replete with devices to worship. For others, this comes across as Google getting a bit ahead of itself. In speaking of eCommerce, Google definitely has a long way to go. Would retail stores help? I doubt it.
Why retail is a good idea for Google
In discussing this topic, we have to address the elephant in the room: Google has no presence. Sure, Android devices are everywhere, but we’re talking about an actual presence. Apple has stores, and very impressive kiosks within larger retailers. Microsoft has just about every computer running its services, and a ton of peripherals, essentially dominating the storefront. Google just doesn’t have much in the way of retail presence. The Chromebook kiosks in Best Buy stores are a small endcap, and only show us two Chromebooks, which is not the extend to what Google is.
Google needs a presence, and they need to put a face to their company. Go into an Apple store, and you get to talk to an actual person. The store is tangible, and the experience real. Google operates as a clandestine company, with no interaction with customers. Do you know the number to the Play Store? Probably not off the top of your head, but you probably know where there is an Apple store in your area. In fact, it’s easier to find an Apple store location than it is the Play Store number in a routine Google search.
Could they do it?
Google has a variety of issues related to simple commerce, and those are the topics they’re not discussing. Kinks in the Google Armor that serve to weaken the entire suit, like supply chain or customer service, are glaring examples of routine failures. These are things that are intrinsic values to a retail environment, yet seem to be lost on Google.
To be fair, Google is coming into its own, and realising more success via Android and device sales than they conceived. This is an understanding of the issue, but not a solution. The solution is for Google to adopt more of a “shoot from the hip” bravado in regard to supply of devices. If the forecast tells you this device will sell 500,000 the first time round, order 1,000,000. Google wisely pays attention to the forecasts, but those have failed them, recently. The Nexus 7 and 4 were both in much higher demand than anticipated, thus making them harder for consumers to get hold of. Fix the supply chain issue, and you’ve fixed a lot. Much can be forgiven so long as we can get devices in-hand.
When you go into a store like WalMart, you don’t expect much in regard to customer service. When you step into a boutique store, you expect much more. If we’re going to spend 0-400 on a device, we want to feel like it’s special, and we’ve done ourselves a favor in purchasing it. We also want to feel like we can come back with any issues we have, however small or silly. This, above all, is where Apple is succeeding with retail. The treatment is wonderful, and the experience makes you want to purchase.
Would consumers care?
Do we really need to visit a Google Store, other than for device purchases? Many Android users have questions about their devices, but those are usually fairly simple fixes… and solved via online forums or Google+ communities. We may want a Google store, but do we need one?
Some of us, who are geekier than normal, will go just to fool around. Some will go to daydream about buying a device once their contract ends with their carrier, and they can buy an unlocked device and save money on their monthly bill. Others will simply stop in to check stuff out, with no intention of buying or caring about the products.
One thing many Android fans lament is the lack of accessories. An Apple store is full of them, which is understandable when you have a very straightforward product design that has no deviance. Designing an accessory is much easier when there is one device with one style. If Google wants to round out a nice retail environment, they’ll need to line up some accessories for their devices, and have them available at launch… not months later.
There is also software, which takes up a bit of space in a normal retail establishment. No Google OS, be it Android or Chrome, has any need for physical software. How do you occupy that space in the store? Well, they could always have display kiosks talking about Google Fiber or Google Glass. A try-on pair of Google Glass would be a huge draw, and Fiber is something more people should be hearing about.
A Google store doesn’t have to be just about stuff, though. Having the Google local teams involved with the store could help. Here in Portland, our local Google office is wonderful, and has plenty of outings which they sometimes charter a bus for. Having the local store serve as the hub of activity for local Google events would be a great way to further integrate Google into our daily lives.
Is Google crazy like a fox?
Google always plays their hand close to the chest. Google never gives us the “caught red-handed” moment we all want. We hear the denials, but we s shouldn’t put much stock into it. Google has always been non-committal about, well, anything. They flat-out denied a social network, and there is a good chance their social network where you heard about this article.
We can all agree that Google has a supply chain issue, but we’d be wise to look at recent developments and speculation as evidence they may be taking steps to remedy that problem. Their purchase of Motorola gives them much more than a patent portfolio, as was the reason given for purchase. It gives them control of the supply chain, and if the Motorola X devices are really going to happen, it will be a litmus test for Google. Can Google, when in full control of the supply chain, keep devices available? The Chromebook Pixel has done well in this regard, but the audience for that is much more finite than would be for a new tablet or phone.
Is the Play Store fixed?
In recent days, my interaction with the Google Play Store has been markedly improved, as I’ve had a device purchase and two separate issues. They have followed up famously, and been communicative throughout the process. This is a night-and-day difference to a few months ago, so I’m left to wonder if something has changed internally. Are they gearing up for something bigger? Has there been a change in attitude at the Play Store? If the idea is that some in-store issues would require Play Store hotline support, that particular area would have to improve, as it seems to.
The problem with Android
As we know, Android and iOS are very different, and that will be an issue should Google decide to actually push forward with retail stores. In iOS, we have a very tightly controlled system, in which the problems are known and training is possible. Android is open source, and lends itself to tinkering.
This presents an issue, as Google would have to basically employ developers or otherwise brilliant folks if they plan to offer thorough service. If I were to buy a Motorola X, then try to flash a ROM and brick the thing (because lets be honest, I would), I’d probably take it in to the Google store, weeping like a child. If Google really wanted to be the hero, I’d get a cookie and some really bright person saving me from myself, restoring my device to normal. This would be wonderful, but those smart guys and girls come at a price, deservedly so.
Andy Rubin is quoted recently as saying Google “has no plans” for retail stores, but what does that even mean? Earlier I mentioned Google flat-out denied a social network… which was reportedly called “Google Circles” at the time. They denied having a product named Circles, which was technically true, but also a bit of misdirection. Throwing the dogs off the scent doesn’t mean you’ve won the chase. When Google denies having plans, that’s not a denial of them exploring the retail space. It’s a denial of “plans”, which could mean a number of things.
We can make all manner of assumptions, but some things are undeniable. Google, at this point, has no idea what they’re doing in the eCommerce landscape, so a move to physical retail may not be a good move right now. They have far too many problems to deal with for us to think they’ll have a store, or stores, opening any time soon.
Sunrise Calendar launched in the App Store this week to mixed buzz. It looks interesting but it only works with Google Calendar and requires — requires — you to login with Facebook before it will let you start using the app. That’s an absolute show stopper for me. I don’t need or want to login to a calendar app, and if I did, while Facebook would be a welcome option among many, I won’t use any third-party app, not ever, where it’s the only option. But that’s not all…
I also use more than Google Calendar. My work stuff is on there, but my personal calendars are all on iCloud. Unless/until Apple’s calendar is supported on Apple’s platform, I lose a unified calendar, which is another deal-breaker for me. Same likely holds true for Exchange users.
I’m also confused as to why Sunrise Calendar is free. Yes, I do look gift-horses in the mouth, especially when there’s a chance they’ll bite me. Free sounds great, but nothing is ever really free. If I’m not paying, someone else is paying. And if I’m not being sold a product, odds are I’m either being sold as a product, or the product I’m being given for free won’t long survive, at least not in the form it’s being given me. I’ve had too many “free” services I’ve grown to like and depend on shut down, or get sold to Google or someone similar and effectively shut down. Not again.
So this is where my Sunrise Calendar “review” ends for now. Get rid of the forced Facebook login, expand beyond Google Calendar, explain a business model I can trust will be around for a while, and I’ll happily give it a full on trial, and who knows, maybe I’ll like it and switch to it?
For now, I can’t even use it.
If you don’t mind Facebook logins, Google-only calendars, or free-as-in-??? apps, check out the video below, and if you like what you see, check out Sunrise Calendar and let me know how it works for you.
- Free – Download now
RSS Copyright © Hottest Mobile Phone News & Reviews | PhoneInferno [Sunrise Calendar: Interesting idea, deal-breaker implementation], All Right Reserved. 2013.
Powered by Readers From RSS 2 Blog